Runtime: 117 min
Audio: AC3
Language: English
Resolution: 640x480
Frame Rate: 25 fps
Video Audio Bitrate: 440 kbps
Audio: AC3
Language: English
Resolution: 640x480
Frame Rate: 25 fps
Video Audio Bitrate: 440 kbps
Year: 2013
Genre: Crime, Drama, Thriller
Director: Ridley Scott
Stars: Michael Fassbender, Penélope Cruz, Cameron Diaz
Genre: Crime, Drama, Thriller
Director: Ridley Scott
Stars: Michael Fassbender, Penélope Cruz, Cameron Diaz
|
Health
Good: 6 | Bad: 3 |
Users review: With a star studded cast, featuring Serena Michael Fassbender, Penelope Cruz, Cameron Diaz, Javier Bardem and Brad Pitt, and directed by Ridley Scott, from a script by novelists more , large living American, Cormac McCarthy, of course I went to see a consultant at face value only. It is true that, except that it is not much effort to film the first half of the film is very bad . This means that the negotiations before and half is very mysterious to her Mirena, with dialogue that is in love with their double entenders and lines that sound like they would be more at home in the novel than speaking aloud human beings. But if you're patient enough to stay with it till the second movie, you will be rewarded witnessed how McCarthy and Scott weave a little more action-together story, quietly leads the viewer into a major concern, and the final ce hypnotic. Performance (standout coming from Bardem) are all right here. These are all great protagonists;, so what else would you expect? The same goes for running. Placeholder adviser has always McCarthys transition from novel to a transition feature film screenplay, which was the first act of failure only in dialogue. In the same spirit, the story of his high caliber of a lawyer who was involved in the drug trade and its masterful design it buys almost only when its all said and done. As mentioned earlier, there is much action here, which can give the illusion that some sequences that occur, but nothing progresses, which can promote watches control. But during a conversation based on the film, as I would prefer dialogue to be treated with great subtlety, subtext is always interesting, is gaining momentum by converging its part in history in the second. Final thought: Advisor is the movie equivalent of artichoke. You either like it or you do not. And both are understandable. Maybe one day, when all critical heat dies down, history will look kindly on this movie. But now, the errors in which most mainstream audiences simply wont be able to forgive. Written by Markus Robinson, edited by Nicole I. Ashland
No comments:
Post a Comment